Procurement teams and underwriters are being asked to price AI risk they can't yet see. Intel AI is the intelligence layer that reads it — contextual threat intelligence mapped to real deployments, formatted for the decision at hand.
A procurement team is onboarding an AI vendor and has a questionnaire, not a risk picture. An underwriter is pricing AI liability off a form and a hunch. Both are making high-stakes decisions on AI systems whose real exposure — model provenance, threat landscape, governance maturity — is invisible to them.
Generic threat feeds don't help; they're noise without context. What these decisions need is intelligence mapped to the specific AI in question, in the language of the decision being made.
When you're onboarding or renewing an AI vendor, we give you a risk picture the questionnaire can't — governance maturity, exposure, and the signals that actually predict a problem.
For brokers and underwriters: independent, contextual signals that let you price and place AI coverage on evidence instead of a form — the same behavioral view underwriting is shifting toward.
Not a generic feed. Threat intelligence mapped to the models and AI systems you actually care about — filtered, enriched, and made relevant to your exposure.
We aggregate the fragmented AI threat landscape into one view — then do the harder part: turning it into a signal you can act on, not a firehose you have to triage.
Intel AI tells you the risk in an AI system you're evaluating or insuring. Evident AI produces the proof for the AI systems you run. One looks outward at exposure, the other looks inward at control — together they cover both sides of every AI risk decision.
Explore Evident AIIntel AI sits between the buyer and the seller of AI risk without a stake in either side's number. That independence is exactly why a procurement lead and an underwriter can both trust what it tells them.
Two buyers with the same blind spot: procurement and vendor-risk teams evaluating AI systems, and brokers and underwriters pricing AI and cyber coverage. Both need to see AI risk they currently can't.
A feed gives you volume; Intel AI gives you relevance. We aggregate the AI threat landscape and then contextualize it to the specific systems and decisions you care about — signal, not noise.
No. Intel AI is independent intelligence. We quantify and contextualize AI risk; we don't have a stake in the number, which is what makes it trustworthy to both sides.
Yes — the risk signals are built to be underwriting-grade, so a broker or underwriter can price and place AI coverage on evidence. It pairs directly with our Insured service.